contact us to request a free case review
or call now (414) 271-7007

When you get injured, we take it personally.

No fees until we win your injury case!

  • association_badge
  • association_badge
  • association_badge
  • Outstanding.

  • Very friendly!

  • Excellent!

Request a Consultation
1 Step 1
Nameyour full name
Emaila valid email
Phoneyour full name
Tell us about your casemore details
0 /
powered by FormCraft
* All fields Required Or Call Now414.206.6565

Settling or Going to Trial: Making the Right Choice in Your Personal Injury Case

Click below to share this on social media:

When an individual sustains injuries due to someone else’s negligence, they are faced with a critical decision: whether to accept a settlement or proceed to trial. This choice can significantly impact the amount of compensation they receive and the duration of their legal pursuit. Settlements offer a certain resolution without the unpredictability of a trial, while going to court could potentially lead to a higher award but comes with increased risk and often more time until resolution.

The decision to settle or go to trial hinges on multiple factors that are specific to each case. These factors include the strength of the evidence, the propensity of the jurisdiction towards plaintiffs or defendants, the estimated time and cost of litigation, and the personal circumstances of the injured party. Attorneys play a pivotal role in advising their clients by providing an informed perspective on the chances of success in trial compared to the benefits of settling out of court.

Understanding the legal process, the potential outcomes of a trial versus a settlement, and how they align with personal goals and resources is essential for making an informed decision. Individuals should weigh the pros and cons carefully, taking into account their readiness to engage in a potentially lengthy legal battle against the immediacy and certainty of a settlement. Legal counsel’s expertise is invaluable in navigating this complex and often emotionally charged decision-making process.

Navigating the complexities of personal injury cases requires careful consideration and reliable guidance. If you or a loved one is grappling with the decision to settle or proceed to trial, don’t navigate this challenging process alone.

Let us, at The Law Offices of Gary S. Greenberg, help you evaluate your options, understand your rights, and pursue the best possible outcome for your case. Contact The Law Offices of Gary S. Greenberg now to schedule a confidential consultation with our team.

Understanding Personal Injury Cases

Personal injury cases arise when an individual suffers harm from an accident or injury, and someone else might be legally responsible for that harm. The ensuing legal process is aimed at compensating the victim for damages incurred.

Types of Personal Injury Claims

Personal injury claims can be categorized into various types, each with its own specific context and legal considerations. The most common types include:

  • Vehicle Accidents: Involving cars, motorcycles, trucks, bicycles, and pedestrians.
  • Slip and Fall Cases: Related to injuries on someone else’s property due to unsafe conditions.
  • Medical Malpractice: Occurs when a health care professional provides substandard care that causes harm.
  • Product Liability: Arises from injuries caused by defective or dangerous products.
  • Workplace Accidents: Related to injuries sustained in the course of employment.

The Role of Negligence

Negligence is a critical factor in personal injury lawsuits. It involves four key elements that must be established:

  1. Duty: The defendant owed a legal duty to the plaintiff.
  2. Breach: The defendant breached that legal duty by acting or failing to act.
  3. Causation: The defendant’s actions or inactions caused the injury.
  4. Damages: The plaintiff suffered legal damages as a result of those injuries.

Proving negligence is paramount to a successful personal injury claim. It requires a clear and evidential link between the defendant’s conduct and the harm sustained by the plaintiff.

Considering Your Options

When an individual faces the decision of settling or going to trial for a personal injury case, they must analyze multiple facets. First and foremost, the strength of the case at hand should be thoroughly assessed, and the limitations set by law should be fully understood.

Assessing the Strength of Your Case

Determining the strength of one’s case is crucial. It involves evaluating evidence, such as medical reports and witness testimony, and understanding legal precedents. A strong case is typically supported by:

  • Clear Liability: Evidence that unambiguously points to the defendant’s fault.
  • Quantifiable Damages: Precise calculation of losses incurred from the injury.

Conversely, a case may be weak if:

  • Liability is shared or disputed.
  • Damages are minimal, or speculative, and not easily quantifiable.

Understanding the Statute of Limitations

The statute of limitations places a legally defined timeframe on the period within which one must file a lawsuit. Failure to act within this timeframe typically results in the loss of one’s right to sue. This timeframe varies by:

  • Jurisdiction: Each state has its own statute of limitations for personal injury cases.
  • Type of claim: Different limitations may apply depending on the specific nature of the injury.

For example, a personal injury statute of limitations could range from 1 to 6 years, depending on state law. Here is a simplified table of hypothetical statutes of limitations in two different states:

StatePersonal Injury(from the date of injury)Property Damage(from the date the propertywas damaged)
California2 years3 years
Texas2 years 2 years

Understanding these aspects is instrumental in making an informed decision on whether to settle a case or proceed to trial.

The Settlement Process

The settlement process is a critical step in resolving a personal injury case, where the parties involved negotiate to reach an agreement without proceeding to trial. A clear understanding of negotiation strategies and accurately calculating damages is essential.

Negotiation Strategies

In the negotiation phase, the injured party’s attorney will discuss compensation with the at-fault party’s insurer or legal representative. Effective strategies involve:

  • Presenting Evidence: Including medical records, witness statements, and expert testimonies to substantiate the claim.
  • Patience and Persistence: It is important to take your time with the process, as better offers may be made as negotiations progress.

Calculating Damages

Determining the appropriate amount of damages includes economic and non-economic losses. The calculation considers:

  • Economic Damages: These are quantifiable costs, such as:
    • Medical expenses
    • Lost wages
    • Property damage
Types of Economic DamageDescription
Medical ExpensesCosts for medical treatment, medication, and rehabilitation.
Lost WagesIncome lost due to the inability to work.
Property DamageCompensation for repairs or replacement of property affected by the incident.
  • Non-Economic Damages: These involve:
    • Pain and suffering
    • Emotional distress
    • Loss of enjoyment of life

Calculations for non-economic damages are more subjective and often use multipliers based on the severity of the injury.

The Trial Procedure

The trial procedure involves distinct stages, each playing a crucial part in the litigation process, starting from initial motions to jury deliberations.

Pre-Trial Motions and Hearings

Pre-trial motions and hearings are a series of legal proceedings where attorneys argue various aspects of the case before the actual trial begins. They may file motions to dismiss the case, exclude evidence, or resolve other legal questions. These hearings set the parameters for the upcoming trial and can significantly influence its course.

Jury Selection and the Role of Evidence

Jury selection is a critical step whereby attorneys for both sides select impartial jurors through a process called voir dire. The selected jurors must be capable of rendering an unbiased verdict based solely on the evidence presented.

Evidence is presented by both the prosecution and defense, and it includes tangible items, witness testimonies, and expert statements. The quality and weight of evidence are essential, as they underpin the jury’s decision-making process. Evidence must adhere to strict legal standards to be admissible in court.

Evaluating the Pros and Cons

In deciding between settling or going to trial for a personal injury case, one must weigh the advantages of a guaranteed outcome against the risks and potential rewards of a court judgment.

Pros of Settling

  • Certainty of Outcome: Settlement offers a guaranteed compensation amount, eliminating the uncertainty of a trial verdict.
  • Reduced Costs: By settling, one avoids the additional legal fees, court costs, and expenses associated with a trial.
  • Privacy: Settlement agreements can typically be kept private, whereas trials are public records.
  • Speed of Resolution: Settlements can be concluded relatively quickly compared to the time it may take to schedule and conduct a trial.
  • Control Over the Outcome: The parties retain control over the agreement and can tailor the settlement to their specific needs.

Cons of Going to Trial

  • Unpredictability: Trials can be highly unpredictable, with juries sometimes delivering surprising verdicts.
  • Potential for Higher Compensation: While a trial could result in a higher verdict than what is offered in a settlement, this is not guaranteed, and it comes with greater risk.
  • More Stressful: The adversarial nature and public scrutiny of a trial can be emotionally stressful for the individuals involved.
  • Time-Consuming: The legal process can be lengthy, often stretching over months or even years before a verdict is reached.
  • No Guarantee of Winning: There is a significant risk that one may receive less than the settlement offer or even lose the case at trial.

Making the Decision

The decision to settle or go to trial in a personal injury case hinges on the specifics of the case, potential recovery, and the client’s personal circumstances.

When to Settle

Deciding on a personal injury case often comes down to settling or going to trial. The choice depends on various factors that can affect the result of the person making the claim. Knowing when to settle can help simplify things and speed up the process.

Settlement Criteria:

  • Certainty of Recovery: If the offered settlement guarantees a tangible recovery and avoids the uncertainty of trial, it might be appealing.
  • Speed of Resolution: Settlements typically conclude much faster than trials, bringing quicker closure and financial relief.
  • Risk Aversion: Those unwilling to gamble on a jury’s decision may find settlement offers a safer alternative.
  • Confidentiality: Settlements can often be kept private, unlike trial outcomes.

When to Proceed to Trial

Going to trial for a personal injury case means thinking about more than just the immediate situation. Deciding to go to trial involves weighing the pros and cons, the risks, and what the person making the claim hopes to achieve.

Trial Considerations:

  • Maximizing Compensation: If the potential compensation from a trial far exceeds the settlement offer, taking the case to court could be justified.
  • Liability Disputes: When a fault is contested or the defense offers an unacceptable settlement, a trial may be the only option for a fair resolution.
  • Principle: Some plaintiffs choose trial to hold the defendant publicly accountable or to create a legal precedent.
  • Insurance Resistance: If the insurance company refuses to make a fair offer, a trial may be necessary to pursue the claim.

Navigating the Legal System

In personal injury cases, understanding the legal framework is critical for a successful outcome. One must select an appropriate attorney and consider alternative dispute resolutions outside of the courtroom.

Choosing the Right Attorney

The choice of attorney is a determinant of case success. The attorney should have:

  • Experience: Track record in personal injury law.
  • Reputation: Positive feedback from past clients.
  • Availability: Commitment to the case.

Alternative Dispute Resolutions

Court trials are not always necessary. Alternative options include:

  1. Mediation:
    • Voluntary process.
    • Involve a neutral third-party mediator.
  2. Arbitration:
    • Binding or non-binding.
    • The arbitrator makes decisions after hearing both sides.

After the Verdict

Once a verdict has been reached in a personal injury case, the parties involved may consider post-trial motions or the appeal process, depending on the outcome and their satisfaction with the decision.

Post-Trial Motions

After a verdict, the losing party often has the opportunity to file post-trial motions. Motions for a new trial or motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) are avenues for a party to ask the court to set aside the jury’s decision. These motions are typically filed if the losing party believes there were legal errors that affected the trial’s outcome or if the verdict is against the weight of the evidence presented.

Appeal Process

Should post-trial motions not yield the desired results, the losing party then has the option to initiate an appeal. This process involves reviewing the lower court’s application of the law. The appellant must file a notice of appeal, usually within 30 days of the decision. The appellate court looks for legal errors that might have affected the verdict and, if found, may order a new trial or reverse the decision. 

The table below outlines the basic steps in the appeal process:

1Filing the notice of appeal
2Preparing the record on appeal
3Submitting briefs to the appellate court
4Oral arguments
5Appellate court decision

During both post-trial motions and the appeal process, the parties must adhere to strict procedural rules and deadlines. The legal system aims to ensure that the case is fairly decided and that both sides have appropriate opportunities to challenge or defend the verdict reached at trial.

Navigating Settlement vs. Trial Decisions in Personal Injury Cases With The Law Offices of Gary Greenberg

At The Law Offices of Gary Greenberg, we recognize the critical nature of the decision-making process involved in personal injury cases—specifically, whether to pursue settlement or proceed to trial. Our firm is committed to providing meticulous and individualized assessments, ensuring that clients are well-informed about the potential implications and outcomes associated with each course of action.

By entrusting your personal injury case to The Law Offices of Gary Greenberg, you can rely on our unwavering dedication to safeguarding your rights and striving for the best possible resolution.

Contact us today to schedule a consultation and make informed decisions tailored to your personal injury case.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  • How does the strength of my case influence the decision to settle or go to trial?

A strong case might provide leverage during settlement negotiations. Conversely, a weak case might make a settlement more appealing than risking a trial.

  • Are there circumstances where going to trial might be more beneficial than settling?

Yes, if the settlement offer is inadequate or if you believe you can secure a significantly higher compensation amount through litigation, going to trial may be justified.

  • How long does a trial typically last compared to settling a case?

Trials can be lengthy, potentially spanning months or even years, whereas settlements can often be reached much more quickly, providing a timely resolution.

  • What costs can I anticipate if I choose to go to trial for my personal injury case?

Trial costs may include attorney fees, court fees, expert witness fees, and potentially higher overall expenses compared to settling out of court.